Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/14/2005 09:30 AM Senate FINANCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB63 | |
SB93 | |
SB46 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 63 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 93 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 46 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
9:38:00 AM SENATE BILL NO. 63 "An Act relating to road signs encouraging the use of safety belts." CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 63(TRA) "An Act relating to road signs encouraging the use of safety belts." This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance Committee. Co-Chair Wilken stated this bill, "Allows the Department of Transportation [and Public Facilities] to erect and maintain road signs that encourage the use of seat belts at the site of a fatal motor vehicle accident." CHERYL SUTTON, Staff to Senator Ben Stevens, asserted that this bill "serves great purpose". She read letter to the editor of a newspaper from Carol Kampen, the mother of a man killed in a motor vehicle accident who was not wearing a seatbelt, as follows. It seems there may be some confusion over Ben Stevens' Senate Bill 63. This is legislation allowing the erection of a roadside memorial sign encouraging the use of seat belts. In the Daily News article "Buckling up high on legislators to-do list" Feb. 9, it states there are six House members who are opposed to this legislation. A roadside memorial sign program is already available to the public; you know the little blue signs that say "Please Don't Drink and Drive" or "Please Drive Safely" and under the sign it lists the name or names of people who have lost their lives. Why would they oppose something that really isn't going to cost anything and will draw attention to the terrible loss of life due to lack of wearing seat belts? I lost my youngest son, Nathan Kampen, in a car accident. He was not wearing his seat belt. When I requested a memorial sign saying "Please Buckle Up" or something similar, I was told it was not available. So I presented by problem to Ben Stevens, and he was kind enough to help. I truly see no reason to oppose this legislation. I could always put up one of the other signs available, but my hope is to remind our young people to "Buckle Up." Ms. Sutton added her astonishment in learning that over 50 percent of motor vehicle related fatalities in Alaska could have been prevented if the individual had been wearing a seatbelt. Senator Olson noted numerous testimony in opposition to this legislation and asked the reason. Ms. Sutton knew of no reason, and surmised that the objection was to separate legislation sponsored by Senator Bunde relating to the use of seatbelts. DON ROBERTS testified via teleconference from Kodiak that he supported the enforcement of laws requiring seatbelt use. However governance of road signs is an administrative function and the legislative process should not be hampered with these types of issues. Ms. Sutton informed that Mrs. Kampen attempted unsuccessfully for months address this matter through the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities before she requested assistance from Senator B. Stevens. The Department does not oppose this bill. Co-Chair Wilken considering version "G" Senator Dyson offered a motion to report SB 63, 24-LS0363\G, from Committee with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal note. Without objection, SB 63 MOVED from Committee with fiscal note #1 from the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities in an indeterminate amount.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|